Spatial Interaction Network Analysis of Crude Oil Trade Relations between Countries along the Belt and Road

doi:10.11947/j.JGGS.2022.0207

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the theories and methods of complex network, crude oil trade flows between countries along the Belt and Road (B&R, hereafter) are inserted into the Geo-space of B&R and form a spatial interaction network which takes the countries as nodes and takes the trade relations as edges. The networked mining and evolution analysis can provide important references for the research on trade relations among the B&R countries and the formulation of trade policy. This paper researches and discusses the construction, statistical analysis, top networks and stability of the crude oil trade network between the B&R countries from 2001 to 2020 from the perspectives of Geo-Computation for Social Sciences (GCSS) and spatial interaction. Firstly, evolutions of out-degree, in-degree, out-strength and in-strength of the top 10 countries in the crude oil trade network are computed and analyzed. Secondly, the top network method is used to explore the evolution characteristics of hierarchical structures. And finally, the sequential evolution characteristics of the crude oil trade network stability are analyzed utilizing the network stability measure method based on the trade relationship autocorrelation function. The analysis results show that Russia has the largest out-degree and out-strength, and China has the largest in-degree and in-strength. The crude oil trade volume of the top 10 import and export networks between 2001—2020 accounts for over 90% of the total trade volume of the crude oil trade network, and the proportion remains relatively stable. However, the stability of the network showed strong fluctuations in 2009, 2012 and 2014, which may be closely related to major international events in these years, which could furtherly be used to build a correlation model between network volatility and major events. This paper explores how to construct and analyze the spatial interaction network of crude oil trade and can provide references for trade relations research and trade policy formulation of B&R countries.

Key words: spatial interaction network; Geo-Computation for Social Sciences (GCSS); the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI); trade relation; network stability

Qixin WANG,Kun QIN,Donghai LIU,Gang XU,Yanqing XU,Yang ZHOU,Rui XIAO. Spatial Interaction Network Analysis of Crude Oil Trade Relations between Countries along the Belt and Road[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2022, 5(2): 60-74.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.8

Appendix:

References 36

[1]	National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Commerce of China. Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-century Maritime Silk Road[M]. Beijing, China: Foreign Languages Press, 2015.
[2]	LIU Weidong. Scientific understanding of the Belt and Road Initiative of China and related research themes[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(5): 538-544. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
[3]	ROY J R, THILL J C. Spatial interaction modelling[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2004.
[4]	LIU Yu, YAO Xin, GONG Yongxi, et al. Analytical methods and applications of spatial interactions in the era of big data[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7):1523-1538. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202007014
[5]	DUENAS M, FAGIOLO G. Modeling the international-trade network: a gravity approach[J]. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2013, 8(1): 155-178. doi: 10.1007/s11403-013-0108-y
[6]	AZZAM M, KLINGAUF U, ZOCK A. The accelerated growth of the worldwide air transportation network[J]. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2013, 212: 35-48.
[7]	WANDELT S, SUN Xiaoqian. Evolution of the international air transportation country network from 2002 to 2013[J]. Transportation Research, 2015, 82:55-78.
[8]	JIA Tao, QIN Kun, SHAN Jie. An exploratory analysis on the evolution of the US airport network[J]. Physica A, 2014, 413: 266-279. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.067
[9]	LIN Jingyi, Ban Yifang. The evolving network structure of US airline system during 1990—2010[J]. Physica A, 2014, 410:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.040
[10]	WANG Jiaoe, MO Huihui, WANG Fahui. Evolution of air transport network of China 1930—2012[J]. Transportation Geography, 2014, 40:145-158.
[11]	DAVIS K F, D’ODORICO P, LAIO F, RIDOLFI L. Global spatio-temporal patterns in human migration: a complex network perspective[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(1): e53723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053723
[12]	QIN Kun, ZHOU Qin, XU Yuanquan, et al. Spatial interaction network analysis of urban traffic hotspots[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(9):1149-1157. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.09.011
[13]	QIN Kun, LIN Hui, HU Di, et al. A review of spatially integrated humanities and social sciences[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2020, 22(5):912-928.
[14]	FANG Zhixiang, LI Qingquan, SHAW S L. What about people in pedestrian navigation?[J] Geo-spatial Information Science, 2015, 18(4):135-150. doi: 10.1080/10095020.2015.1126071
[15]	LINDNER A, PITOMBO C S, ROCHA S S, et al. Estimation of transit trip production using factorial kriging with external drift: an aggregated data case study[J]. Geo-spatial Information Science, 2016, 19(4): 245-254. doi: 10.1080/10095020.2016.1260811
[16]	GARLASCHELLI D, LOFFREDO M I. Structure and evolution of the world trade network[J]. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2005, 355(1):138-144.
[17]	YANG Yu, POOP J P H. LIU Y, et al. Small and flat worlds: a complex network analysis of international trade in crude oil[J]. Energy, 2015, 93:534-543. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.079
[18]	WANG M G, TIAN L X, DU R J. Research on the interaction patterns among the global crude oil import dependency countries: a complex network approach[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 180: 779-791. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.026
[19]	LIU Zhigao, WANG Tao, SONN J W, et al. The structure and evolution of trade relations between countries along the Belt and Road[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(9): 1233-1248. doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1522-9
[20]	LIU G, YE K H. Research on evolution characteristics of China’s high-speed railway based on complex network[J]. Transport Research, 2017, 3(3): 6-13.
[21]	JIAN L X, Li D B, Zhao S Z. Evolution characteristics of complex networks in China’s coastal ports[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(12): 96-103.
[22]	WISON A G. A statistical theory of spatial distribution models[J]. Transportation Research, 1967, 1(3): 253-269. doi: 10.1016/0041-1647(67)90035-4
[23]	SIMINI F, GONZALEZ M C, MARITAN A, et al. 2012. A universal model for mobility and migration patterns[J]. Nature, 2012, 484(7392): 96-100. doi: 10.1038/nature10856
[24]	ZHAO Z D, YANG Z, ZHANG Z, et al. Emergence of scaling in human interest dynamics[J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: 3472. doi: 10.1038/srep03472
[25]	YAN X Y, ZHAO C, FAN Y, et al. Universal predictability of mobility patterns in cities[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2014, 11(100): 20140834. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0834
[26]	MONTROLL E W, WEISS G H. Random walks on lattices[J]. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1965, 6(2): 167-181. doi: 10.1063/1.1704269
[27]	SONG C, KOREN T, WANG P, et al. Modelling the scaling properties of human mobility[J]. Nature Physics, 2010, 6(10): 818-823. doi: 10.1038/nphys1760
[28]	ZHONG W Q, AN H Z, GAO X Y, et al. The evolution of communities in the international oil trade network[J]. Physica A, 2014, 413:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.055
[29]	DU R J, DONG G G, TIAN L X, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and fitness analysis of global oil market: based on complex network[J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(10):e0162362.
[30]	ZHANG H Y, JI Q, FAN Y. Competition, transmission and pattern evolution: a network analysis of global oil trade[J]. Energy Policy, 2014, 73(1):312-322. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.020
[31]	WANG J Z. Energy cooperation ideas and policies on the “Belt and Road”[J]. National Governance Weekly, 2016, (26): 37-48.
[32]	DU R Y, WANG Y, DONG G G, et al. A complex network perspective on interrelations and evolution features of international oil trade 2002—2013[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 196:142-151. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.042
[33]	ZHOU M, GANG W, XU H L. Structure and formation of top networks in international trade, 2001—2010[J]. Social Networks, 2016, 44: 9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.006
[34]	JOO K, SUH J H, LEE D, et al. Impact of the global financial crisis on the crude oil market[J]. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2020, 30: 100516.
[35]	GAO C, SUN M, SHEN B. Features and evolution of international fossil energy trade relationships: a weighted multilayer network analysis[J]. Applied energy, 2015, 156: 542-554. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.054
[36]	BARIGOZZI M, FAGIOLO G, MANGIONI G. Identifying the community structure of the international-trade multi-network[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2011, 390(11): 2051-2066. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.02.004

Country name	ISO code	Country name	ISO code
Afghanistan	AFG	Malaysia	MYS
Albania	ALB	Maldives	MDV
Armenia	ARM	Republic of Moldova	MDA
Azerbaijan	AZE	Mongolia	MNG
Bahrain	BHR	Montenegro	MNE
Bangladesh	BGD	Myanmar	MMR
Belarus	BLR	Nepal	NPL
Bhutan	BTN	Oman	OMN
Bosnia and Herzegovina	BIH	Pakistan	PAK
Brunei Darussalam	BRU	State of Palestine	PLE
Bulgaria	BGR	Philippines	PHL
Cambodia	KHM	Poland	POL
China	CHN	Qatar	QAT
Croatia	HRV	Romania	ROU
Czech Republic	CZE	Russian Federation	RUS
Egypt	EGY	Saudi Arabia	SAU
Estonia	EST	Serbia	SRB
Georgia	GEO	Singapore	SGP
Hungary	HUN	Slovakia	SVK
India	IND	Slovenia	SVN
Indonesia	IDN	Sri Lanka	LKA
Islamic Republic of Iran	IRN	Syrian Arab Republic	SYR
Iraq	IRQ	Tajikistan	TJK
Israel	ISR	Thailand	THA
Jordan	JOR	Timor-Leste	TLS
Kazakhstan	KAZ	Turkey	TUR
Kuwait	KWT	Turkmenistan	TKM
Kyrgyzstan	KGZ	Ukraine	UKR
Lao People’s Democratic Republic	LAO	The United Arab Emirates	ARE
Latvia	LVA	Uzbekistan	UZB
Lebanon	LBN	Viet Nam	VNM
Lithuania	LTU	Yemen	YEM
North Macedonia	MKD