Object-oriented Battlefield Environment Simulation Process Object Model Based on Task-driven

doi:10.11947/j.JGGS.2019.0304

Abstract

Abstract:

Battlefield environment simulation process is an important part of battlefield environment information support, which needs to be built around the task process. At present, the interoperability between battlefield environment simulation system and command and control system is still imperfect, and the traditional simulation data model cannot meet war fighters’ high-efficient and accurate understanding and analysis on battlefield environment’s information. Therefore, a kind of task-orientated battlefield environment simulation process model needs to be construed to effectively analyze the key information demands of the command and control system. The structured characteristics of tasks and simulation process are analyzed, and the simulation process concept model is constructed with the method of object-orientated. The data model and formal syntax of GeoBML are analyzed, and the logical model of simulation process is constructed with formal language. The object data structure of simulation process is defined and the object model of simulation process which maps tasks is constructed. In the end, the battlefield environment simulation platform modules are designed and applied based on this model, verifying that the model can effectively express the real-time dynamic correlation between battlefield environment simulation data and operational tasks.

Key words: battlefield environment simulation; GeoBML; object-orientated; task driven; process modeling

Jie ZHU,Xiong YOU,Qing XIA,Hongjun ZHANG. Object-oriented Battlefield Environment Simulation Process Object Model Based on Task-driven[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2019, 2(3): 31-43.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.1

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

References 25

[1]	HU Xiaofeng . War Engineering:The Methodology of War Toward the Information Age (Revised Edition)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017: 86-90.
[2]	YOU Xiong . Battlefield Environment Simulation[M]. Beijing: PLA Press, 2012: 20-24.
[3]	BERNARD M F, PULLEN J M, HIEB M , et al. Battle Management Language Transformations [C]//Proceedings of Transforming Training and Experimentation through Modelling and Simulation. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO, 2006: 13-14.
[4]	HIEB M, POWERS M, PULLEN M , et al. A Geospatial Battle Management Language (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning [C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Cambridge: ICCRTS, 2006.
[5]	HIEB M R, MACKA Y, POWERS M W , et al. Geospatial Challenges in a Net Centric Environment: Actionable Information Technology, Design, and Implementation [C]//Proceedings of SPIE 6578, Defense Transformation and Net-centric Systems 2007. Orlando, FL: SPIE, 2007.
[6]	YUAN Limiao, BAO Guangyu, ZHU Li . Method for Formalizing Battle Management Language Grammar Based on BNF[J]. Journal of Military Communications Technology, 2010,31(4):35-39.
[7]	LUO Chen, BAO Guangyu, LIU Xiaoming , et al. Grammar Formal Method of Battle Management Language Based on Improved-BNF[J]. Computer Science, 2012,39(4):189-192, 209. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-137X.2012.04.043.
[8]	BAO Guangyu, ZHU Li, QIN Yao , et al. A Semantic Annotation Method for BML Order Based on Ontology[J]. Computer Technology and Development, 2012,22(9):71-74, 79.
[9]	YANG Shanliang, HUANG Jian, YIN Hang , et al. Formalization Representation of Scenario Based on MSDL and C-BML[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2011,23(8):1724-1728.
[10]	Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Inc. SISO-STD-011-2014 Standard for Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Phase 1[S]. Orlando, FL: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Inc., 2013.
[11]	MUÑOZ-MORERA J, MAZA I, CABALLERO F , et al. Architecture for the Automatic Generation of Plans for Multiple UAS from a Generic Mission Description[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 2016,84(1-4):493-509. DOI: 10.1007/s10846-016-0354-z.
[12]	BLAIS C L . Unmanned Systems Interoperability Standards[R]. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2016.
[13]	BLASCH E, BÉLANGER M . Agile Battle Management Efficiency for Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) [C]//Proceedings of SPIE 9842, Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXV. Baltimore, MD: SPIE, 2016: 98420P.
[14]	KLEINER M, CAREY S, ROBERTS J , et al. Geospatial Battle Management Language: Bridging GIS, C2 and Simulations [C]//ESRI User’s Conference 2007: 2107.
[15]	SCHADE U, FREY M . A Linguistic Foundation for Communicating Geo-information in the Context of BML and GeoBML[R].[S.l.]: US Army Engineer Research & Development Center- International Research Office, 2010.
[16]	WANG Shumin, LIU Junyou, GAN Jiang . Study on the Normative Description Method of Operational Mission[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2006,20(3):27-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8211.2006.03.006.
[17]	YANG Shixing, YANG Dongsheng, ZHANG Weiming , et al. Research on Method of Mission Decomposition and Task Modeling[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2009,34(8):24-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2009.08.006.
[18]	LI Xinzhong, LI Si . Research on Operational Task Refinement and Specification Description[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2012,26(3):31-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8211.2012.03.008.
[19]	YANG Yinghui, LI Jianhua . Construction Method of System Battle Information Flow Chart based on Task Space[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2015,29(3):62-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8211.2015.03.012.
[20]	CHENG Kai, CHE Junhui, ZHANG Hongjun , et al. Formal Description of Operational Task and Its Process Expression[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2012,34(1):15-19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3819.2012.01.004.
[21]	Multilateral Interoperability Programme (MIP). The Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model Metamodel (JC3IEDM Metamodel)[EB/OL]. 2012-02-14)[2017-10-15]. https://publ-ic.mip-interop.org/Public%20Document%20Library/04-Baseline_3.1/Interface-Specification/JC3-IEDM/JC3IEDM-Metamodel-Specification-3.1.4.pdf.
[22]	ZHAO Xinye, HU Fenghua, ZHANG Peng , et al. A Owl-based Approach for Coalition Battle Management Language Ontology Development[J]. System Simulation Technology, 2012,8(4):271-278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1964.2012.04.003.
[23]	LI Deren, HUANG Junhua, SHAO Zhenfeng . Design and Implementation of Service-oriented Spatial Information Sharing Framework for Digital City[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2008,33(9):881-885.
[24]	GONG Jianya, LI Xiaolong, WU Huayi . Spatio-temporal Data Model for Real-time GIS[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2014,43(3):226-232, 275. DOI: 10.13485/j.cnki.11-2089.2014.0033.
[25]	LI Yong, CHEN Shaopei, TAN Jianjun , et al. A Study of Event-driven Spatio-temporal Data Model for Urban Public Traffic[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2007,36(2):203-209, 217.

Serial number	Field code	Field name	Field type	Field length	Remarks
1	ProSimID	Simulation process id	Long	10	Primary key
2	ProSimName	Simulation process name	Varchar2	20
3	ProSimType	Simulation process type	Varchar2	20
4	ProSimAttr	Simulation attribute data	Varchar2	20
5	BeEnvSimID	Object ID before simulation process changes	Long	10	Foreign key
6	AfEnvSimID	Object ID after simulation process changes	Long	10	Foreign key
7	EnvSimObject	Relevant environmental elements in simulation process	Sdo_Geometry		Object geometric information and attribute information in Oracle Spatial
8	ProSimRule	Simulation process association rules	Varchar2	20
9	Sim_ST	Valid time of simulation start	date	10
10	Sim_ET	Valid time of simulation termination	date	10
…		…	…	…	…