Understandings of Urban Sustainability in China: a Bibliometric Analysis Using Chinese Literatures

doi:10.11947/j.JGGS.2024.0108

Abstract

Abstract:

Cities hold a critical responsibility for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) due to their high population density, extensive resource consumption, and significant economic contributions. To examine the present state of understandings regarding urban sustainability (SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities) within Chinese research communities, this study collected 15 950 papers from 1994 to 2022 on the 12 indicators of SDG 11, from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), a hub of Chinese academic papers, that directly relate to policymaking. Significant research topics on SDG 11 were identified for each indicator using bibliometrics analysis approaches. The high-frequency keywords and clusters of keywords over the last three decades reveal that existing studies primarily concentrated on the physical aspects, such as transportation and environment, while there is a lack of consideration of societal aspects. This indicates a limited and biased understanding of the urban sustainability within the Chinese academic community. Hence, it is crucial to prioritize the societal aspects in order to develop a research agenda that further advances urban sustainability.

Key words: urban sustainability; SDG 11; bibliometric; Chinese research communities

WU Shuang, YUE Yang, LI Xuesong. Understandings of Urban Sustainability in China: a Bibliometric Analysis Using Chinese Literatures[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2024, 7(1): 105-122.

Figures/Tables 17

Figure 1

Table A

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Table B

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Figure 11

Figure 12

Table C

Figure 13

Table 1

References 53

[1]	PICKETT S T A, CADENASSO M L, GROVE J M. Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 69(4): 369-384.
[2]	BETTENCOURT L, WEST G. A unified theory of urban living[J]. Nature, 2010, 467(7318): 912-913.
[3]	AKURAJU V, PRADHAN P, HAASE D, et al. Relating SDG11 indicators and urban scaling - an exploratory study[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 52: 101853.
[4]	United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development[R]. New York: United Nations, 2015.
[5]	United Nations. The new urban agenda[R]. Quito: United Nations, 2017.
[6]	GRIGGS D, STAFFORD-SMITH M, GAFFNEY O, et al. Sustainable development goals for people and planet[J]. Nature, 2013, 495(7441): 305-307.
[7]	PURVIS B, MAO Yong, ROBINSON D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins[J]. Sustainability Science, 2019, 14(3): 681-695. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
[8]	LIU Jianguo, DIETZ T, CARPENTER S R, et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems[J]. Science, 2007, 317(5844): 1513-1516. doi: 10.1126/science.1144004 pmid: 17872436
[9]	IRWIN E G, BOCKSTAEL N E. The evolution of urban sprawl: evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(52): 20672-20677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705527105 pmid: 18093930
[10]	KLOPP J M, PETRETTA D L. The urban sustainable development goal: indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities[J]. Cities, 2017, 63: 92-97.
[11]	YANG Huizi, LI Xiuzhen, ELLIOTT M. Integrated quantitative evaluation framework of sustainable development - the complex case of the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2023, 232: 106426.
[12]	LIU Yunqiang, ZHU Jialing, LI E Y, et al. Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: the case of Yangtze River economic belt in China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 155: 119993.
[13]	ZHENG L, SHEPHERD D, BATUO M E. Variations in the determinants of regional development disparities in rural China[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2021, 82: 29-36.
[14]	LIANG Yuyun, YAO Yao, YAN Xiaoqin, et al. Estimating the spatial variation of electricity consumption anomalies and the influencing factors[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2022, 5(2): 29-37. doi: 10.11947/j.JGGS.2022.0204
[15]	BRYAN B A, GAO Lei, YE Yanqiong, et al. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency[J]. Nature, 2018, 559(7713): 193-204.
[16]	PATA U K. Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: a sustainability perspective[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 173: 197-208.
[17]	LUO Shiyue, YIMAMU N, LI Yueran, et al. Digitalization and sustainable development: how could digital economy development improve green innovation in China?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(4): 1847-1871.
[18]	AHMAD N, LIU Youjin, ŽIKOVIĆ S, et al. The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: evidence from China[J]. Technology in Society, 2023, 72: 102184.
[19]	LOU Bo, QIU Yonghai, ULGIATI S. Emergy-based indicators of regional environmental sustainability: a case study in Shanwei, Guangdong, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 57: 514-524.
[20]	CHEN Liang, HUANG Huan, HAN Dong, et al. Investigation on the spatial and temporal patterns of coupling sustainable development posture and economic development in World Natural Heritage Sites: a case study of Jiuzhaigou, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 146: 109920.
[21]	LI Sijia, SUN Zhongchang, GUO Huadong, et al. Localizing urban SDGs indicators for an integrated assessment of urban sustainability: a case study of Hainan province[J]. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2024, 17(1): 2336059.
[22]	DAWODU A, GUO Chenggang, ZOU Tong, et al. Developing an integrated participatory methodology framework for campus sustainability assessment tools: a case study of a sino-foreign university in China[J]. Progress in Planning, 2024, 183: 100827.
[23]	RAO Gaoqi, XIA Enshang, LI Qi. Investigation of language choice among international academic articles and the use of Chinese in the recent decade[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2020(2): 37-51.
[24]	LI He. The Chinese discourse on good governance: content and implications[J]. Journal of Contemporary China, 2020, 29(126): 824-837.
[25]	TAN Yongtao, XU Hui, ZHANG Xiaoling. Sustainable urbanization in China: a comprehensive literature review[J]. Cities, 2016, 55: 82-93.
[26]	YANG Zhenshan, YANG Hang, WANG Hong. Evaluating urban sustainability under different development pathways: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 61: 102226.
[27]	GUO Jing, PENG Xuhui. Status of research on Sustainable Development Goal 11: a visual analysis using citespace and ArcGIS[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2023, 30(6): 713-725.
[28]	WHITE M A. Sustainability: i know it when i see it[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013, 86: 213-217.
[29]	ELSEVIER. SciVal - SDGs[EB/OL]. [2023-12-11]. https://scival.com/sdg.
[30]	NIJKAMP P, PEPPING G. A meta-analytical evaluation of sustainable city initiatives[J]. Urban Studies, 1998, 35(9): 1481-1500.
[31]	FU Yang, ZHANG Xiaoling. Trajectory of urban sustainability concepts: a 35-year bibliometric analysis[J]. Cities, 2017, 60: 113-123.
[32]	DONTHU N, KUMAR S, MUKHERJEE D, et al. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 133: 285-296.
[33]	WALTMAN L, VAN ECK N J, NOYONS E C M. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(4): 629-635.
[34]	CHEN Chaomei. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
[35]	MORAL-MUÑOZ J A, HERRERA-VIEDMA E, SANTISTEBAN-ESPEJO A, et al. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review[J]. El Profesional de la Información, 2020, 29(1): e290103.
[36]	PEI Zerong, CHEN Shuting, DING Liqin, et al. Current perspectives and trend of nanomedicine in cancer: a review and bibliometric analysis[J]. Journal of Controlled Release, 2022, 352: 211-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.023 pmid: 36270513
[37]	XU Min, CHEN Xingtong, KOU Gang. A systematic review of blockchain[J]. Financial Innovation, 2019, 5(1): 27.
[38]	JIANG Kai, ASHWORTH P. The development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) research in China: a bibliometric perspective[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 138: 110521.
[39]	XIA Haishan, LIU Zishuo, EFREMOCHKINA M, et al. Study on city digital twin technologies for sustainable smart city design: a review and bibliometric analysis of geographic information system and building information modeling integration[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 84: 104009.
[40]	BAR-ILAN J. Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—a review[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2(1): 1-52.
[41]	WANG Qi. A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(2): 290-304.
[42]	VAN ECK N J, WALTMAN L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 523-538. pmid: 20585380
[43]	COBO M J, LÓPEZ-HERRERA A G, HERRERA-VIEDMA E, et al. SciMAT: a new science mapping analysis software tool[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(8): 1609-1630.
[44]	ARIA M, CUCCURULLO C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(4): 959-975.
[45]	MUKHERJEE D, LIM W M, KUMAR S, et al. Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 148: 101-115.
[46]	MICROSOFT. SmartKG[EB/OL]. [2024-04-26]. https://github.com/microsoft/SmartKG.
[47]	NILSSON M, GRIGGS D, VISBECK M. Policy: map the interactions between Sustainable Devel-opment Goals[J]. Nature, 2016, 534(7607): 320-322.
[48]	LIU Jianguo, HULL V, GODFRAY H C J, et al. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1(9): 466-476.
[49]	PRADHAN P, COSTA L, RYBSKI D, et al. A systematic study of sustainable development goal interactions[J]. Earth’s Future, 2017, 5(11): 1169-1179.
[50]	LE BLANC D. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets[J]. Sustainable Development, 2015, 23(3): 176-187.
[51]	LUSSEAU D, MANCINI F. Income-based variation in sustainable development goal interaction networks[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2(3): 242-247.
[52]	WEITZ N, CARLSEN H, NILSSON M, et al. Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda[J]. Sustainability Science, 2018, 13(2): 531-548. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0470-0 pmid: 30147787
[53]	ISSA L, MEZHER T, EL FADEL M. Can network analysis as certain SDGs interlinkages towards evidence-based policy planning? A systematic critical assessment[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2024, 104: 107295.